| # | Post Title | Result Info | Date | User | Forum |
| eBlocker Download Image and converter scripts for x86 UEFI Systems | Relevance | 2 Wochen ago | e94904 | eBlocker Open Source Forum |
| | I figured since eBlocker doesn't provide a UEFI compatible image, I figured I would take it upon myself to make a script that can make one. I have a link to some scripts that I made that takes in the x86 image and makes it UEFI compatible. This is because most of the newer thin client PC's on the market are UEFI only and don't have a CSM mode. Not to mention that any chrome boxes converted to have a UEFI bios also don't support legacy CSM boot either. www(dot)github(dot)com(slash)e94904(slash)eBlocker-Legacy-Boot-to-UEFI-Converter I also have some ... |
| Problem with Home-Network | Relevance | 3 Monaten ago | KalkLeiste | Bugs & Issues |
| | Hello eBlocker-Fans, When I start my eBlocker on above named Raspi4, the eBlocker kickes away the Fritz!Box and overtakes its place - no Internet any more. If I take my PI400, the eBlocker works fine. The Raspi4 itself with Bullseye works fine but homenet crashes, if it is connected to. As a workaround i connected the raspi4 with a new eBlocker installed by an USB to Ethernet Adapter, but it doesn't work. The same Raspi4 with Bullseye, is connecting immediatly to the Internet. Is it possible to teach eBlocker (for Example by editing a config-File) to use th ... |
| eBlock 4.0.2 ThinClient - Android Apps Issues | Relevance | 10 Monaten ago | Joe | eBlocker Open Source Forum |
| | @bpr Since my HP EliteDesk 800 is not an option for me due to the problem with the Intel LAN connection for the eBlocker4, I switched to a new (used) thin client (Lenovo ThinkCentre M75n with Ryzen 3 Pro 3300U, 8GB and 128 GB SSD). First, I used eBlocker3 on this hardware for three weeks to have a basis for comparison. With eBlocker 4.0.2, I observed the following issues. Threema: does not connect initially (red line). Only after briefly disabling HTTPS activation for the smartphone does the connection work and remain active with HTTPS activation until t ... |
| There is now an eBlocker 4 Docker image available for testing! (v. 4.0.2) | Relevance | 10 Monaten ago | Shedowe | eBlocker Open Source Forum |
| | There is now an eBlocker 4 Docker image available for testing! (arm64 & x86_64 worked) Docker Hub: Highlights:- Full eBlocker system (including systemd) inside a container- Runs in a macvlan network as its own device (own IP & MAC)- Persistent root filesystem via volume (`/eblocker-root`) A sample docker-compose setup is included in the Repository Overview on Docker Hub. Docker Run equivalent Using docker run with macvlan requires two steps: first creating the network, then running the container. 1. Create the Macvlan network: (Adjust paren ... |
| eBlocker Docker Container | Relevance | 12 Monaten ago | Lerain | eBlocker Open Source Forum |
| | Greetings, I’m looking for a way to run eBlocker inside a Docker container. I know there’s a VM Edition available for both VirtualBox and VMware, but that’s full virtualization - not Dockerization. I even tried converting the VM image into a Docker container using an OVA-to-Docker converter, but I hit a roadblock due to missing dependencies (qemu-utils and parted). I also tried using the pre-made unclejay/eblocker image, which I thought would be exactly what I needed, but the console logs showed Maven failing to fetch the correct dependencies, so that at ... |
