[Solved] Blocked vs passed requests

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
198 Views
(@Anonymous)
New Member Guest
Joined: 1 Sekunde ago
Posts: 0
Topic starter  

My dashboard shows “Percentage blocked 2,2%”. What does this mean?
97.8% has been allowed to pass and everything passed was ‘clean’?

Does it provide info about the performance of the eBlocker; its ‘goalkeeper’-function?

Rob

B572EDF7 89E4 4ECC A4DB 17468B399931

   
ReplyQuote
Topic Tags
(@random)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 6 Jahren ago
Posts: 2073
 

It’s simple math: Blocked requests /(divided by) Total requests = Ratio of blocked request.

In your case ratio is 2.2%. In my case 6.5%. It indicates how much eBlocker saved you of „nonsense“ in terms of requests. 

A page visit usually sends several request to get all individual page elements (images, video, font etc. - but also tracker and ads). One request per element.

I‘m not sure what you mean with your gatekeeper question. eBlocker blocks 100% of trackers/ads/malware it finds matches for...

Hope this helps.

THX!


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous)
New Member Guest
Joined: 1 Sekunde ago
Posts: 0
Topic starter  
Posted by: @random

In your case ratio is 2.2%. In my case 6.5%. It indicates how much eBlocker saved you of „nonsense“ in terms of requests. 

Just to understand, does this mean that you visit more ‘tricky’ (whichever) sites than i do; that you are - for whatever reason - more ‘under attack’ than i am?

Posted by: @random

eBlocker blocks 100% of trackers/ads/malware it finds matches for...

This than means, that the ONLY flaw the eBlocker has, is the quality of the lists used. Correct?


   
ReplyQuote
(@benne)
Famed Member Admin
Joined: 6 Jahren ago
Posts: 1097
 

@robfranssen-fr I‘m at 4.7%.

I would rather iterpret that I am visiting more sites with lots of ads as I‘m a „news adict“. And if you‘d call data collecting ads „attackers“, you are right 🤔 😉

And yes, filter lists are core - especially in easylist format, as they are using pattern independend of a domain. That makes eBlocker so powerful compared to „dumb“ domain blockers (i.e, the pi-hole alternative is DNS only).


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous)
New Member Guest
Joined: 1 Sekunde ago
Posts: 0
Topic starter  

@benne and/or @random

Got it, thank you (both) for the info. Another small eBlocker-mystery solved.

Rob 


   
ReplyQuote

Nach oben scrollen