I hope I won't be too annoying if I bring up the topic of Wireguard support again, but it has now become a virtual standard due to its "simplicity and speed"! I don't know what is/would be more difficult to implement, tapping the connections from the router so that eBocker can work with it, or integrating a Wireguard server function into eBlocker, or are there perhaps other approaches that I have no idea about? Proxy? Or ??? In any case, it would be great if eBlocker could get this feature in the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, my Fritzbox is responsible for this so far, but it would be a milestone if eBlocker could do this for me in the future... 😊
Thanks for your post. I wish that we had only as many developers as ideas for new features. At the very moment our focus is eBlockerOS 4 which binds all resources.
If someone from the community wants to step up for the wireguard implementation: you are highly welcome 🤗
Otherwise I fear the feature has to wait - unfortunately. BTW @henryfatzke: you can vote for the wirecard feature in the Feature Request forum to advance it's priority...
Thanks for your post. I wish that we had only as many developers as ideas for new features. At the very moment our focus is eBlockerOS 4 which binds all resources.
If someone from the community wants to step up for the wireguard implementation: you are highly welcome 🤗
Otherwise I fear the feature has to wait - unfortunately. BTW @henryfatzke: you can vote for the wirecard feature in the Feature Request forum to advance it's priority...
I badly would, if i could, but sadly my qualification to do so is far to less 😉
Anyway, thanks for your answer and the hard work from all developers...
Will eblocker work if wireguard is upstream?
You ask if you can connect via wireguard to eblocker? Not shure, because i just rebuild my nework from scratch, but i guess so. The point to me is, eblocker is at the moment blind for wireguard connections/devices, so you get no shelter from eblocker for such devices...